PREDICTION: Within six months of moving into the Oval Office, Obama’s multiple moves to silence critics in the media and elsewhere will lead to Washington, D.C. becoming the Caracas on the Potomac.
There were multiple signs before The Washington Times, New York Post and Dallas Morning News got the boot. Hugo Chavez has long used mob intimidation to pressure opposition forces into submission. Obama has made a limited use of the same tactic, as when National Review’s Stanley Kurtz began some potentially damaging reporting about the Democratic nominee’s long relationship with unrepentant Weather Underground terrorist bombers William Ayers and wife Bernadine Dohrn.
In retaliation, the Obama campaign issued a call-to-censor alert to its supporters, especially against Milt Rosenberg, a long-time and highly respected Chicago radio host who invited Kurtz to discuss his reporting on air. The Obama campaign declined to provide an official to share the program and rebut Kurtz. Instead, hundreds of callers did what they were instructed to do by the Obama campaign – they jammed the station’s phone lines with protest calls demanding that Kurtz be silenced and accusing the show’s host of lowering journalism standards.
The Obama campaign had done the same thing a few weeks earlier when Rosenberg had as a guest another Obama critic, book author David Freddoso, whose book, “The Case Against Barack Obama,” has been lauded as a solid journalistic effort to uncover the rest of the story left out of the Chicago pol’s two autobiographies.
Once he is sworn in, expect Obama to move on multiple fronts to intimidate or silence critics. He has expressed opposition to renewal of the Fairness Doctrine, an action that would all but destroy Talk Radio and cripple the expression of conservative dissent. But he could accomplish much the same effect by imposing ownership caps and other measures, as Jesse Walker pointed out recently:
“There’s a host of other broadcast regulations that Obama has not foresworn. In the worst-case scenario, they suggest a world where the FCC creates intrusive new rules by fiat, meddles more with the content of stations’ programs, and uses the pending extensions of broadband access as an opportunity to put its paws on the Internet. At a time when cultural production has been exploding, fueled by increasingly diverse and participatory new media, we would be stepping back toward the days when the broadcast media were a centralized and cozy public-private partnership.” — Mark Tapscott at the DC Examiner
Art Barack Obama chilling effect Congress Criminal Investigations David Limbaugh Eric Holder Fairness Doctrine FCC Fighting Back Free Speech Free Speech and Higher Education hate speech Henry Rivera historical Interviews Intimidation Joe Biden Joe the Plumber Lawyers Left localism Mark Steyn Medical Records MySpace New York Obama Obama Supporters Other Nations Police Privacy Protest Racial Slurs Racism Retribution School Schools Second Amendment Senate Stimulus Bill Students T-Shirts Talk Radio Unpopular speech Waxman