<link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="http://www.unfairdoctrine.org/wp-content/plugins/ajax-comment-posting/acp.css" /><?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Unfair Doctrine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unfairdoctrine.org/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unfairdoctrine.org</link>
	<description>No law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 05:14:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Covert Fairness Doctrine? by February 23 roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.unfairdoctrine.org/?p=201&#038;cpage=1#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>February 23 roundup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 05:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unfairdoctrine.org/?p=201#comment-97</guid>
		<description>[...] Obama says he opposes revival of talk-radio-squelching Fairness Doctrine, though some in Congress favor it; some worry that under-the-radar FCC rules could accomplish some of the same effects without using the name [Matt Lasar and Julian Sanchez, Ars Technica; Ken @ Popehat] Both FCC and Waxman&#8217;s office deny report that Congressman met with staffers to promote new controls [Broadcasting &amp; Cable, Unfair Doctrine] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Obama says he opposes revival of talk-radio-squelching Fairness Doctrine, though some in Congress favor it; some worry that under-the-radar FCC rules could accomplish some of the same effects without using the name [Matt Lasar and Julian Sanchez, Ars Technica; Ken @ Popehat] Both FCC and Waxman&#8217;s office deny report that Congressman met with staffers to promote new controls [Broadcasting &amp; Cable, Unfair Doctrine] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Free Speach by melissa</title>
		<link>http://www.unfairdoctrine.org/?p=213&#038;cpage=1#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 01:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unfairdoctrine.org/?p=213#comment-95</guid>
		<description>That was probably my fault.  Sorry about that.  I&#039;ve always had a problem with, well, vowels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was probably my fault.  Sorry about that.  I&#8217;ve always had a problem with, well, vowels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Senator DeMint to Press for Broadcast Freedom Act by Scaramouche</title>
		<link>http://www.unfairdoctrine.org/?p=220&#038;cpage=1#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Scaramouche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unfairdoctrine.org/?p=220#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Good catch. 

I&#039;ll share this story. Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good catch. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll share this story. Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spokesperson: Obama opposes new Fairness Doctrine by ACORN, &#8220;localism&#8221; and free speech &#124; Unfair Doctrine</title>
		<link>http://www.unfairdoctrine.org/?p=210&#038;cpage=1#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>ACORN, &#8220;localism&#8221; and free speech &#124; Unfair Doctrine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unfairdoctrine.org/?p=210#comment-93</guid>
		<description>[...] developments on this front.  As we linked below, the Obama Administration came out clearly saying they oppose the reimposition of the Fairness Doctrine — which seems, puzzlingly, to contradict a lot of things other Democrats, including Obama [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] developments on this front.  As we linked below, the Obama Administration came out clearly saying they oppose the reimposition of the Fairness Doctrine — which seems, puzzlingly, to contradict a lot of things other Democrats, including Obama [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why we&#8217;re here by Might the stimulus package contain a new way to punish those who dare to question authority? &#124; Unfair Doctrine</title>
		<link>http://www.unfairdoctrine.org/?p=22&#038;cpage=1#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Might the stimulus package contain a new way to punish those who dare to question authority? &#124; Unfair Doctrine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 19:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unfairdoctrine.org/?p=22#comment-84</guid>
		<description>[...] may recall that this blog was founded largly based on outrage over what happened when Joe dared to ask a question.  But at least his [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] may recall that this blog was founded largly based on outrage over what happened when Joe dared to ask a question.  But at least his [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sen Harkin: &#8220;Gotta Get The Fairness Doctrine Back In Law&#8221; by Bill Clinton calls for &#8220;balance&#8221; &#124; Unfair Doctrine</title>
		<link>http://www.unfairdoctrine.org/?p=183&#038;cpage=1#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Clinton calls for &#8220;balance&#8221; &#124; Unfair Doctrine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unfairdoctrine.org/?p=183#comment-81</guid>
		<description>[...] to bring it back; that it&#8217;s just a right-wing boogyman meant to scare you.  Every time a democrat calls for it, well, that&#8217;s just one person, who has no real [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to bring it back; that it&#8217;s just a right-wing boogyman meant to scare you.  Every time a democrat calls for it, well, that&#8217;s just one person, who has no real [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Public&#8221; Airwaves? by Scaramouche</title>
		<link>http://www.unfairdoctrine.org/?p=180&#038;cpage=1#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Scaramouche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 22:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unfairdoctrine.org/?p=180#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Moobats can&#039;t handle the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moobats can&#8217;t handle the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Julius Genachowski to head FCC by Media Wars: The Bampire Strikes Back - Josh_Painter&#8217;s blog - RedState</title>
		<link>http://www.unfairdoctrine.org/?p=153&#038;cpage=1#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Media Wars: The Bampire Strikes Back - Josh_Painter&#8217;s blog - RedState</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unfairdoctrine.org/?p=153#comment-74</guid>
		<description>[...] the chairmanship of the FCC. Genachowski&#8217;s position on the Fairness Doctrine is&#8230; unknown. Some powerful Democrats, including Chuck Shumer, Dick Durbin and Dianne Feinstein, are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the chairmanship of the FCC. Genachowski&#8217;s position on the Fairness Doctrine is&#8230; unknown. Some powerful Democrats, including Chuck Shumer, Dick Durbin and Dianne Feinstein, are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mason (OH) School Superintendent: &#8220;Inappropriate comments that may make other students, staff or families feel unwelcome or uncomfortable in school or on the bus will not be tolerated,&#8221; by melissa</title>
		<link>http://www.unfairdoctrine.org/?p=160&#038;cpage=1#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unfairdoctrine.org/?p=160#comment-72</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be attending the inaguaration festivities at my law school this afternoon (funny, I was attending a university in the same system in 2001, but I don&#039;t remember any &quot;festivities&quot; at all on January 20th.  I&#039;m sure it&#039;s just my bad memory.)  I certainly won&#039;t be rude or disrespectful, but I&#039;m sure not planning to be careful whether or not I make people feel &quot;unwelcome,&quot; either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be attending the inaguaration festivities at my law school this afternoon (funny, I was attending a university in the same system in 2001, but I don&#8217;t remember any &#8220;festivities&#8221; at all on January 20th.  I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s just my bad memory.)  I certainly won&#8217;t be rude or disrespectful, but I&#8217;m sure not planning to be careful whether or not I make people feel &#8220;unwelcome,&#8221; either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mason (OH) School Superintendent: &#8220;Inappropriate comments that may make other students, staff or families feel unwelcome or uncomfortable in school or on the bus will not be tolerated,&#8221; by Scaramouche</title>
		<link>http://www.unfairdoctrine.org/?p=160&#038;cpage=1#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Scaramouche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 05:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unfairdoctrine.org/?p=160#comment-71</guid>
		<description>So if the Obama comments make McCain supporters feel unwelcome?

Someone needs to start subjecting these people to the law of unintended consequences so they learn their folly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if the Obama comments make McCain supporters feel unwelcome?</p>
<p>Someone needs to start subjecting these people to the law of unintended consequences so they learn their folly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->